約 6,207,343 件
https://w.atwiki.jp/lslwiki/pages/203.html
llList2Key key llList2Key(list src, integer index) 機能概略 サンプル Tips 詳細な説明 History 来客数： - 選択肢 投票 役に立った (0) 役立たずだった (0) 名前 コメント
https://w.atwiki.jp/twwiki/pages/43.html
秘密の庭 1.聖なる炎の認印付き指輪を装備して宿屋の南のオドに会う。 2.庭先に化け物が出るので退治してほしいと依頼を受ける。 3.飲まされる。 4.酩酊状態で外に出されエキノップスと戦闘になる。 （たまたま時間が悪かった？） NOTE オドの家の近くに焚き火があるので、そこまで移動し1h瞑想して酒を抜くと楽に戦える。 NOTE2 抜刀状態になれば普通に移動・攻撃ができるので、外に出たら鋼の剣をクリックして抜刀・ファストスタイル＆イグニの印で攻める。 5.倒してオドに報告。報酬100オレン
https://w.atwiki.jp/viprererererer/pages/107.html
「key半島。」 ハロプログッズ×2 ♪ 食料品 日用品 2012/08/15(水)
https://w.atwiki.jp/pipopipo555jp/pages/2920.html
（付録） 目次 新たな時代における日本の安全保障と防衛力の将来構想 ―「平和創造国家」を目指して― Japan s Vision for Future Security and Defense Capabilities in the New Era Toward a Peace-Creating Nation Summary This report is written by the Council on Security and Defense Capabilities in the New Era. It proposes that Japan be a nation that contributes to the peace and security of the region and the world, while accomplishing its prime objectives to secure peace, promote prosperity and ensure the safety of Japan. In other words, the report propounds a proactive “Peace-Creating Japan.” contents SummaryCHAPTER ONE Security StrategiesSection 1 Objectives Section 2 Security Environment Surrounding Japan Section 3 Strategies and Instruments CHAPTER TWO Modality of Defense CapabilitiesSection 1 Basic Concepts Section 2 Response to Various Contingencies Section 3 Securing Stability in the Areas Surrounding Japan Section 4 Improving Global Security Environment Section 5 Function and Arrangements of Defense Capabilities CHAPTER THREE Infrastructure that Bolsters the Defense ForceSection 1 Personnel Infrastructure Section 2 Materiel Infrastructure Section 3 Social Infrastructure CHAPTER FOUR Infrastructure that Bolsters Japan’s Security StrategySection 1 Constructing Infrastructure for National Security Planning and Crisis Management at the Cabinet Section 2 Constructing Infrastructure for Integrated and Cooperative Relations among Domestic and International Actors Section 3 Broadening and Strengthening Intellectual Infrastructure CHAPTER ONE Security Strategies Section 1 Objectives Japan’s security objectives are to ensure its safety and prosperity; to promote the stability and prosperity of the area surrounding Japan as well as the world; and to maintain a free and open international system. For Japan’s safety and prosperity, it requires the maintenance and development of its economic capability, freedom to undertake economic activities, and freedom of movement. The safety of Japan includes that of Japanese nationals who live or stay abroad, ensured through international coordination. As for promoting the stability and prosperity of the area surrounding Japan and the world, maintaining access to markets and safety of sea lines of communications (SLOCs) are common interests of both Japan and the world. To maintain a free and open international system, it is necessary for Japan to deepen cooperation with major powers in the interest of maintaining the world order and abiding by international norms. Universal and basic values such as freedom and dignity of the individuals should be upheld. Section 2 Security Environment Surrounding Japan The following trends can be discerned in the current global security environment 1) economic and social globalization which created transnational security challenges and increased conflicts in the “gray zones” between peace and crisis; 2) the rise of emerging powers such as China, India and Russia and the relative decline in overwhelming superiority of the United States, resulting in a global shift in balance of power and deterioration of international public goods; 3) increasing risks of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and their delivery means; and 4) continuing regional conflicts, failed states, international terrorism and international crimes. In line with these broader trends, important issues for the areas surrounding Japan and Japan itself include challenges such as changing U.S. deterrence, continuing uncertainty in the Korean Peninsula, shifting regional balance of power brought about by the rising China, and continuing instabilities on SLOCs from Middle East and Africa to Japan and in the coastal states. Section 3 Strategies and Instruments Considering the above-mentioned trends and characteristics of Japan’s economy and defense posture as well as geographic and historical constraints, Japan’s identity, which should be translated into its foreign and security policies, can best be expressed as a “Peace-Creating Japan.” Its basic idea is that the way to achieve Japan’s own safety is by contributing to global peace and stability, and by adopting a basic posture of active participation in international peace cooperation, non-traditional security and human security. A Peace-Creating Japan’s security objectives can be attained by its own efforts and by cooperation with its ally as well as multi-layered security cooperation. Its strategies and instruments include utilizing various diplomatic tools; building defense capability; enhancing interagency cooperation and cooperation between public and private sectors; achieving common strategic objectives with the ally; securing safety of global commons; upholding U.S. extended deterrence; promoting cooperation and engagement with partners and emerging powers, and promoting cooperation within multilateral security frameworks, among others. With the role of the military becoming diversified, the “Basic Defense Force” (BDF) concept, which has limited Japan’s defense capabilities only for the purpose of rejection of external invasion, is no longer valid. Based on recognition that defense equipment cooperation or defense assistance could be effective tools for improving the security environment and international relations, defense cooperation and assistance should be carried out on the basis of a new set of principles, superseding the de facto export prohibition policy under the “Three Principles on Arms Export, etc.” CHAPTER TWO Modality of Defense Capabilities Section 1 Basic Concepts Recent developments in military science and technology and decreased warning time before contingency, among others, have contributed to a change in characteristics of defense capabilities. These developments have increased the importance of “dynamic deterrence” through which a defense force demonstrates high operational performance in normal circumstances by conducting timely and appropriate operations, such as surveillance and preparation against airspace violation, in contrast to the traditional “static deterrence” focused on quantities and size of weapons and troops. It is time for Japan to depart from the BDF concept and to achieve necessary and in-depth reform of its defense posture that can adequately respond to complex contingencies in which various events may break out simultaneously. Although the SDF needs to prepare for various changes in the future and to consider maintaining minimum essential know-how in responding against major armed invasion, the SDF must not use the BDF concept as an excuse for preserving units or weapons of lesser importance in light of future trends in security environment. Japan should be more attentive to the formation of credible dynamic deterrence, endorsed by response capabilities to various contingencies, while sustaining the target of “multi-functional, flexible and effective defense capabilities” stated in the National Defense Program Guidelines on and after FY2005. Section 2 Response to Various Contingencies The SDF will be likely to face various contingencies such as 1) ballistic and/or cruise missile strikes; 2) attacks by special operations forces, terrorists, or cyber-attacks; 3) operations to maintain security of territorial waters/airspace and remote islands; 4) emergency evacuation operations of Japanese nationals; 5) armed conflicts in areas surrounding Japan; 6) a combination of the above contingencies (contingency complex); and 7) major disasters and pandemics. Section 3 Securing Stability in the Areas Surrounding Japan With the premise of close cooperation with the U.S. forces under the Japan-U.S. security arrangements, the MOD/SDF needs the following efforts, among others, for stability of the areas surrounding Japan 1) enhancing Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) activities; 2) promoting defense cooperation with the ROK and Australia and multilateral cooperation, and fostering defense exchanges and security dialogues with China and Russia; and 3) active engagement to regional security frameworks such as the ARF and ADMM Plus. Section 4 Improving Global Security Environment The SDF should display Japan’s presence in the world through international peace cooperation activities. In collaboration with other agencies and organizations in Japan and overseas, the SDF should be involved in activities to improve global security environment such as 1) assisting failed/fragile states and increasing participation in international peacekeeping operations; 2) countering international crimes including terrorism and piracy; 3) responding to major disasters; 4) dealing with proliferation of WMD/ballistic missiles, especially enhancing collaboration in PSI arena; and 5) promoting global defense cooperation/exchange. Also, defense assistance funded by Japan should be made available as an option. Section 5 Function and Arrangements of Defense Capabilities With the above roles and missions in mind, Japan’s building of defense capabilities should specifically aim at obtaining capabilities for stabilization of regional/global order; effective response to a contingency complex in cooperation with the United States; and seamless reaction to an event that develops from peace time to emergency. To these ends, each of the SDF service branch should work together to enhance capabilities such as ISR capability, responsiveness, mobility, and Japan-U.S. interoperability, sustained by advanced technologies and information. Future building of defense capabilities should not concentrate solely on upgrade of weapons, but aim at an optimum combination of options based on an objective assessment of capabilities the SDF has of its own. In light of a proper roles and missions sharing within the context of the Japan-U.S. alliance, the SDF should aim to enhance complementary capabilities vis-a-vis those of U.S. forces. It is also important for the SDF to expand the scope of missions that it carries out by its own capacity to include those requested in peacekeeping operations. To appropriately respond to various and complex contingencies, the SDF needs to strengthen and expand its jointness. Each tri-service needs “selection and concentration,” by enhancing required capabilities such as ISR, while reviewing less urgent weapons or arrangements. The SDF should also reinforce capabilities applicable to international missions such as long-distance mobility, as well as ensuring operational arrangements for unit rotation and logistic support that enable the SDF operations to be sustainable. CHAPTER THREE Infrastructure that Bolsters the Defense Force Section 1 Personnel Infrastructure The MOD should promptly design a new system that will address the SDF’s challenges in personnel infrastructure of the SDF in a time of declining birth rates and long-life expectancy, and start building it. The design should be based on sufficient evaluation through comparisons of multiple options via simulation and other methods, and answer the purpose of securing personnel with needed skills, and providing incentives to SDF personnel. In doing so, special attentions should be paid to such aspects as rebalancing of rank and age structure; effective outsourcing; and proper recruitment and fully-cared retirement and reemployment of SDF personnel. Section 2 Materiel Infrastructure Japan’s domestic defense production and technology infrastructure are trapped in vicious cycle of small-scale procurement, high-cost production, and decreased investment. To remedy this, the Japanese Government in consultation with the private sectors should promote selection and concentration in the fields of production and technology that are to be sustained in Japan. Hence, the Japanese Government must present a defense industrial and technology strategy. At the same time, to save Japanese defense enterprises from being left behind in international technology innovation, the Japanese Government should allow these enterprises to participate in international joint development and/or production projects. With a careful design to contribute to international peace and improvement of Japan’s security environment, it should revise current arms export prohibition policy. For the MOD to acquire and maintain equipment while keeping the costs within a reasonable range, it should carry on its comprehensive reforms of defense acquisition. Especially, at the procurement stage, it should try harder to make long-term contracts that the defense enterprises also deem advantageous. Section 3 Social Infrastructure Neither the SDF nor the Japan-U.S. alliance can function effectively without the support of the Japanese public and the understanding and assistance of local residents in areas where defense facilities are situated. The Japanese Government is responsible for providing accurate information and appropriate explanation to the Japanese public. It must also undertake to communicate critical information in a contingency, making much of info-communication technology evolution. The stationing of the SDF units must be reviewed constantly in consideration of defense requirement. At the same time, the importance of the SDF meeting expectations of local people should not be neglected. Because the existence of defense facilities could affect living conditions of locals, the Japanese Government needs to solicit their understanding and cooperation. Above all, it should pay particular attention to excessive burdens on Okinawa residents, and work on mitigating these burdens while cooperating with the U.S. Government. The both Governments should examine shared use of defense facilities which is tangible as a way of reducing burdens. CHAPTER FOUR Infrastructure that Bolsters Japan’s Security Strategy Section 1 Constructing Infrastructure for National Security Planning and Crisis Management at the Cabinet Security organs subordinate to the Cabinet have augmented their functions through a series of structural reforms. One of remaining challenges is to conduct a government-wide extensive exercise bearing in mind a national emergency such as an “Armed Attack Situation” so as to verify whether the current security organs are functioning adequately and to make additional preparations. Another is to put into place an effective system that enables them to develop a security strategy. Intelligence organs of the Cabinet have also made progress. Much needs to be improved, however, in such fields as all-source analysis that makes full use of information gathered from all government organs; and efforts of rotating intelligence cycle of the cabinet-level more effectively. Other intelligence capabilities that should be strengthened include outer and cyber-space situational awareness and HUMINT (human intelligence), while envisioning a satellite system aiming at security and maritime domain awareness as mid- and long-term targets for improvement. Information security should be further enhanced to protect Japan s own intelligence and to work with foreign counterparts. It leads to a necessity of legislation of a secret protection law. Important government policy guidelines such as the “National Defense Program Guidelines” require constant review. Though our council was formed to present a blue-ribbon-panel report to the Government, this format should be abandoned. Instead, we propose, as an option, that the Cabinet Secretariat or other organs establish a permanent council composed of experts from private sectors, who will continuously work on the security and defense policy through discussion. With this proposed change in format, we expect a security strategy will be further defined in a broader sense. Section 2 Constructing Infrastructure for Integrated and Cooperative Relations among Domestic and International Actors Inter-agency cooperation among government agencies, central and local government cooperation, and Government and private sector cooperation should be actively promoted to tackle agendas both domestic and international. A new forum for inter-agency cooperation needs to be created for the purpose of reconstructing failed states. In light of the increasing importance of private-sector exchanges in confidence-building, the Government should consider cooperative relations with the private sectors in this field. In the field of international peace cooperation activities, the Government should promote civil-military cooperation with the NGOs in concrete terms, thereby promoting peace-building capabilities of Japan as a whole. Agendas for a better-functioning Japan-U.S. alliance include those which relate to Japanese Government’s conventional interpretation of the Constitution concerning exercise of the right of self-defense. The current official interpretation of Japan s Constitution does not allow Japanese defense forces to defend U.S. vessels against attack or to intercept ballistic missiles aimed at U.S. territory if such attacks were to occur prior to an armed attack situation against Japan. To prevent damage to the Japan-U.S. alliance arising from this situation, the Japanese Government must squarely tackle this issue responsibly. Of crucial importance is the question of the Government’s political will concerning what Japan should do; reviewing the above official interpretation needs to be done with this question of political will foremost in mind. As international peace cooperation activities are evolving into multi-functional ones, Japan’s system to execute peace cooperation activities, which was formed just after the end of the Cold-War, is now partly outdated. So-called “Five Principles on Japan’s Participation in UN Peacekeeping Operations” should therefore be revised constructively. Moreover, the SDF as their own mission should be authorized to conduct protection of foreign personnel and logistic support to units from other countries as its own missions since they have nothing to do with use of force which the Constitution prohibits. If necessary, the Government should change its interpretation of the Constitution. In addition, it is of great importance that Japan possesses a permanent law regarding international peace cooperation activities which should serve as a basic law for that area. Section 3 Broadening and Strengthening Intellectual Infrastructure While the field of security is widening its scope, scholars will have more opportunities of joining Government’s decision making process related to security issue. At the same time, it is indispensable to improve international security environment with a range of expertise that are exchanged and shared among scholars and NGO activists as well as military and security officials. Japan should actively nurture people who can operate internationally in the field of security. Given the increasing importance of internal and international networks of think-tanks dedicated to security affairs, the modality of Japanese think-tanks and other non-profit organizations should be reconsidered so as to enable them to operate in financially stable conditions. The Prime Minister must explain the Government’s position and measures on security issues clearly and in a timely manner, even at a time of crisis. Structures that assist the Prime Minister for strategic communication should be reinforced. The outbound communication of the Government including via websites should also be improved. So far, Japanese private sector has exerted stronger communication power. Maintenance and enrichment of the Japanese intellectual infrastructure will be the key to strengthening Japan’s communication power. （付録） 目次
https://w.atwiki.jp/pizyumi/pages/22.html
追跡不能な支払いのための不視署名 Blind signatures for untraceable payments 序論 Introduction 顧客が利用できる様々な電子銀行業務の成長に見られるように、商品や役務に対する代金支払い方法の自動化が既に進行中である。新しい電子決済方式の根本的な構造は、私事権および電子決済の犯罪使用の内容と範囲に対して実質的な影響を持っているかもしれない。新しい電子決済方式は、理想的にはこのような一見して相反する懸念の両方に対処すべきである。 Automation of the way we pay for goods and services is already underway, as can be seen by the variety and growth of electronic banking services available to customers. The ultimate structure of the new electronic payments system may have a substantial impact on personal privacy as well as on the nature and extent of criminal use of payments. Ideally a new payments system should address both of these seemingly conflicting sets of concerns. 一方、個人によって実行されたあらゆる取引に対する支払いの受取人、金額および時間の情報は、個人の所在、交友関係および生活様式に関して第三者に非常に多くのことを明らかにする可能性がある。たとえば、交通機関、旅館、食堂、映画館、劇場、講演会、食物、医薬品、酒類、書籍、雑誌などに対する支払いや会費、宗教的もしくは政治的な寄付金などの支払いのことを考えよ。 On the other hand, knowledge by a third party of the payee, amount, and time of payment for every transaction made by an individual can reveal a great deal about the individual’s whereabouts, associations and lifestyle. For example, consider payments for such things as transportation, hotels, restaurants, movies, theater, lectures, food, pharmaceuticals, alcohol, books, periodicals, dues, religious and political contributions. 一方、紙幣や硬貨のような匿名決済の方式は管理手段や安全保障が欠如しているという弱点がある。たとえば、決済証明の欠如、決済媒体の盗難、賄賂のための不正な決済、脱税および闇市場などの問題のことを考えよ。 On the other hand, an anonymous payments systems like bank notes and coins suffers from lack of controls and security. For example, consider problems such as lack of proof of payment, theft of payments media, and black payments for bribes, tax evasion, and black markets. 本論文では、下記の性質を有する自動化された決済方式を実現可能にする根本的に新しい種類の暗号学的手法（cryptography）を提案する。 1 第三者は個人によって実行された支払いの受取人、時間および金額を断定することができない。 2 個人は決済証明を提供することができ、また、特別な状況下では受取人の正体を突き止めることができる。 3 盗難に遭ったという報告を受けた決済媒体の使用を停止することができる。 A fundamentally new kind of cryptography is proposed here, which allows an automated payments system with the following properties (1) Inability of third parties to determine payee, time or amount of payments made by an individual. (2) Ability of individuals to provide proof of payment, or to determine the identity of the payee under exceptional circumstances. (3) Ability to stop use of payments media reported stolen. 不視署名の暗号系 Blind signature cryptosystems 新しい種類の暗号学的手法は、最初に類推を使って導入し、次にその要素、使用法および結果として生じる安全性を説明することによって導入することにする。実際の暗号系（cryptosystem）の例は提示しない。 The new kind of cryptography will be introduced first in terms of an analogy and then by description of its parts, their use, and the resulting security properties. No actual example cryptosystem is presented. 基本的な概念 Basic idea 不視署名（blind signature）の概念は、卑近な紙の書類の世界から持ち込まれる例によって説明することができる。不視署名に対応する紙の書類の世界の類似物は、カーボン紙で内側が覆われた封筒を使って実装することができる。そのような封筒の外側に署名すると、封筒の中にあるカーボン紙に署名の複写が残ることになる。 The concept of a blind signature can be illustrated by an example taken from the familiar world of paper documents. The paper analog of a blind signature can be implemented with carbon paper lined envelopes. Writing a signature on the outside of such an envelope leaves a carbon copy of the signature on a slip of paper within the envelope. 秘密投票方式によるが、有権者が単一の帽子の中に投票用紙を入れるために集まることができないような選挙を実施したいと思っている選挙管理機関が直面する問題のことを考えよ。それぞれの有権者は、自分の投票を選挙管理機関に対して秘匿することができるのか非常に懸念しており、更に、自分の投票が本当に数えられているか検証可能にするよう要求している。 Consider the problem faced by a trustee who wishes to hold an election by secret ballot, but the electors are unable to meet to drop their ballots into a single hat. Each elector is very concerned about keeping his or her vote secret from the trustee, and each elector also demands the ability to verify that their vote is counted. この問題の解決策は、特別な封筒を使用することによって得られる。それぞれの有権者は、自身の意思を記入した投票用紙をカーボン紙で内側が覆われた封筒の中に入れ、その封筒を自身の返送用宛名を付し、選挙管理機関に宛てたもう1つの封筒の中に入れ、その封筒を選挙管理機関に郵送する。選挙管理機関は、有権者の返送用宛名が書かれた封筒を受け取ったら、中からもう1つの封筒を取り出し、その封筒の外側に署名し、新しい封筒の中に入れ、受け取った封筒に書いてある返送用宛名に宛てて返送する。このようにして、正当性が認められた有権者だけが、署名された投票用紙を受け取ることができる。もちろん、選挙管理機関はその選挙に対してのみ有効な特別な署名を使用する。 A solution can be obtained by use of the special envelopes. Each elector places a ballot slip with their vote written on it in a carbon lined envelope; places the carbon lined envelope in an outer envelope addressed to the trustee, with their own return address; and mails the nested envelopes to the trustee. When the trustee receives an outer envelope with the return address of an elector on it, the trustee removes the inner carbon lined envelope from the outer envelope; signs the outside of the carbon lined envelope; and sends the carbon lined envelope back, in a new outer envelope, to the return address on the old outer envelope. Thus, only authorized electors receive signed ballot slips. Of course, the trustee uses a special signature which is only valid for the election. 有権者は、署名された封筒を受け取ったら、中から内側がカーボン紙で覆われた封筒を取り出し、その封筒の署名を確認し、中から署名された投票用紙を取り出す。選挙日になったら、投票用紙を新しい封筒の中に入れて、返信用宛名を書かずに、選挙管理機関に郵送する。 When an elector receives a signed envelope, the elector removes the outer envelope; checks the signature on the carbon lined envelope; removes the signed ballot slip from the carbon lined envelope; and mails the ballot to the trustee on the day of the election in a new outer envelope, without a return address. 選挙管理機関は、投票用紙を受け取ったら、それを公開することができる。誰でも掲示された投票用紙の枚数を数えることができ、また、投票用紙の署名を確認することができる。有権者が投票用紙の繊維模様のような、自身の投票用紙を特定できる何らかの特徴を記憶しているならば、自身の投票用紙が公開されているか確認することができる。しかしながら、選挙管理機関は、投票用紙に署名する際に決して投票用紙を見ることはないので、（全ての署名が同一であると仮定すると）選挙管理機関は、投票用紙が誰のものであるか特定できるような如何なる特徴も知ることはできない。そのため、選挙管理機関は、投票用紙が含まれている署名された封筒と公開される投票用紙との間の対応について何も知ることはできない。したがって、選挙管理機関は、誰が何に投票したのかを断定することができない。 When the trustee receives the ballots, they can be put on public display. Anyone can count the displayed ballots and check the signatures on them. If electors remember some identifying aspect of their ballot, such as the fiber pattern of the paper, they can check that their ballot is on display. But since the trustee never actually saw the ballot slips while signing them (and assuming every signature is identical), the trustee can not know any identifying aspect of the ballot slips. Therefore, the trustee can not know anything about the correspondence between the ballot containing envelopes signed and the ballots made public. Thus, the trustee can not determine how anyone voted. 関数 Functions 不視署名系は、純粋に2つの鍵を用いるデジタル署名系と交換様式の公開鍵系が特別な方法で結合された系の特徴を有するものであると考えられるかもしれない。下記の3つの関数が不視署名の暗号系を構成している。 1 署名者のみが知っている署名関数 s およびそれに対応する公知の逆関数 s で、s が s についての手掛かりを与えないもの。 2 提供者のみが知っている交換関数 c およびその逆関数 c で、c (s (c(x)))=s (x) が成り立ち、c(x) および s が x についての手掛かりを与えないもの。 3 有効な署名の探索を非現実的にするのに十分な冗長性を有するか確認する冗長性確認述語 r。 Blind signature systems might be thought of as including the features of true two key digital signature systems combined in a special way with commutative style public key systems. The following three functions make up the blind signature cryptosystem (1) A signing function s’ known only to the signer, and the corresponding publically known inverse s, such that s(s’(x))=x and s give no clue about s’. (2) A commuting function c and its inverse c’, both known only to the provider, such that c’(s’(c(x)))=s’(x), and c(x) and s’ give no clue about x. (3) A redundancy checking predicate r, that checks for sufficient redundancy to make search for valid signatures impractical. 手順 Protocol これらの関数は、上で説明した例で、カーボン紙で内側が覆われた封筒が使用されるのと似た方法で使用される。 1 提供者は r(x) が真であるような x を無作為に選び、c(x) を生成し、署名者に渡す。 2 署名者は c(x) に s’ を適用することによって署名 s’(c(x)) を生成し、提供者に返す。 3 提供者は署名 s’(c(x)) に c’ を適用することによって裸状態の署名 c’(s’(c(x)))=s’(x) を生成する。 4裸状態の署名 s’(x) に署名者の公開鍵 s を適用し、r(s(s’(x))) が真であるか調べることによって、誰でも s’(x) が本当に署名者によって生成されたものであるか確認することができる。 The way these functions are used is reminiscent of the way the carbon paper lined envelopes were used in the example described above (1) Provider chooses x at random such that r(x), forms c(x), and supplies c(x) to signer. (2) Signer signs c(x) by applying s’ and returns the signed matter s’(c(x)) to provider. (3) Provider strips signed matter by application of c’, yielding c’(s’(c(x)))=s’(x). (4) Anyone can check that the stripped matter s’(x) was formed by the signer, by applying the signer’s public key s and checking that r(s(s’(x))). 性質 Properties 上記の関数と手順からなる不視署名方式は、下記の安全保障の性質を有していることが望ましい。 1 デジタル署名――誰でも裸状態の署名 s’(x) が本当に署名者の秘密鍵 s’ を用いて生成されたものであるか確認することができる。 2 不視署名――署名者は裸状態の署名の集合の要素 s’(xi) と裸状態ではない署名の集合の要素 s’(c(xi)) の間の対応に関して何も知ることができない。 3 署名の保全――提供者は署名者によって生成されたそれぞれの署名に対して裸状態の署名を最大でも1つまでしか生成することができない（すなわち、c, c’, xi に対する裸状態ではない署名 s’(c(x1)) … s’(c(xn)) を保有していても、y!=xi であり r(y) が真であるような s’(y) を生成するのは非現実的である）。 The following security properties are desired of the blind signature system comprising the above functions and protocols (1) Digital signature—anyone can check that a stripped signature s’(x) was formed using signer’s private key s’. (2) Blind signature—signer knows nothing about the correspondence between the elements of the set of stripped signed matter s’(xi) and the elements of the set of unstrapped signed matter s’(c(xi)). (3) Conservation of signatures—provider can create at most one stripped signature for each thing signed by signer (i.e. even with s’(c(x1)) … s’(c(xn)) and choice of c, c’, and xi, it is impractical to produce s’(y), such that r(y) and y!=xi). 暗号学の研究でよく目にするように、独立して生成された無作為の数が同一の値である可能性があるということは無視している。 As is common in cryptographic work, the possibility that the same random number could be generated independently is ignored. 追跡不能な支払い方式 Untraceable payments system 模範的な支払い取引の例を用いて、追跡不能な支払い方式を構築するために、上で導入した不視署名の方法がどのように使用できるのかを説明することにする。重要なのは、銀行はどのようなものにも自身の秘密鍵で署名するが、そのようにして署名された全てのものは、たとえば、1ドルという風に、一定の価値しか持たないということである。下記の例で登場する人物および機関は、銀行、支払人および受取人である。支払人が1枚の紙幣を生成し、銀行が署名し、支払人が裸の状態にし、受取人に与えられ、銀行が消去する。1回の支払い取引は、詳細には下記のような段階で進行する。 1 支払人は r(x) が真であるような x を無作為に選び、紙幣 c(x) を生成する。 2 支払人は紙幣 c(x) を銀行に転送する。 3 銀行は紙幣に署名する。すなわち、s’(c(x)) を生成する。更に、支払人の口座の借方に金額を記入する。 4 銀行は署名した紙幣 s’(c(x)) を支払人に返送する。 5 支払人は c’(s’(c(x)))=s’(x) を生成することによって紙幣を裸の状態にする。 6 支払人は s(s’(x))=x が成り立つかどうかを確認して、そうでなければ中断する。 7 それから暫くして、支払人は支払いを行うために受取人に紙幣 s’(x) を渡す。 8 受取人は r(s(s’(x))) が真であるかどうかを確認して、そうでなければ中断する。 9 受取人は紙幣 s’(x) を銀行に転送する。 10 銀行はr(s(s’(x))) が真であるかどうかを確認して、そうでなければ中断する。 11 銀行は消去済みの紙幣を網羅した一覧表に受け取った紙幣を追加する。受け取った紙幣が既に一覧表の中に存在する場合は中断する。 12 銀行は受取人の口座の貸方に金額を記入する。 13 銀行は受け取りが受理されたことを受取人に通知する。 An example payment transaction will illustrate how the blind signature systems introduced above can be used to make an untraceable payments system. The critical concept is that the bank will sign anything with its private key, but anything so signed is worth a fixed amount, say $1. The actors in the example below are a bank, a payer, and a payee. A single note will be formed by the payer, signed by the bank, stripped by the payer, provided to the payee, and cleared by the bank. The following traces the detailed steps of a single payment transaction (1) Payer chooses x at random such that r(x), and forms note c(x). (2) Payer forwards note c(x) to bank. (3) Bank signs note, i.e. forms s’(c(x)), and debits payer’s account. (4) Bank returns the signed note, s’(c(x)), to payer. (5) Payer strips note by forming c’(s’(c(x)))=s’(x). (6) Payer checks note by checking that s(s’(x))=x and stops if false. (7) Payer makes payment some time later by providing note s’(x) to payee. (8) Payee checks note by forming r(s(s’(x))) and stops if false. (9) Payee forwards note s’(x) to bank. (10) Bank checks note by forming r(s(s’(x))) and stops if false. (11) Bank adds note to comprehensive list of cleared notes and stops if note already on list. (12) Bank credits account of payee. (13) Bank informs payee of acceptance. 上記の不視署名の性質により、銀行は、消去されることになる紙幣を段階9で受取人から受け取っても、元々その紙幣が段階4でどの支払人に対して発行されたものであるか知ることはない。デジタル署名およびそれに関連する上記の署名性質の保持によって、偽造行為が不可能であることが保証される。 Notice that by the blind signature property above, when the bank receives a note to be cleared from the payee in step (9) the bank does not know which payer the note was originally issued to in step (4). The digital signature and related conservation of signatures properties above ensure that counterfeiting is not possible. 監査可能性 Auditability 現在の取引慣行を電子的な世界に演繹すると、支払人は受取人からデジタル領収書を受け取るということになる。このような領収書には、購入した商品あるいは役務に対する説明および購入日が記載されているだろう。それに加えて、領収書には、支払いに使用した紙幣の複製を添付することができる。会計監査のような特別な状況下では、支払人は、領収書に添付されている紙幣の複製によって、銀行と協力して（また、後述のように清算機関と協力して）、紙幣が実際にはどの口座に預け入れられたのかを検証することができるだろう。 Extension of current practice suggests that payers receive digital receipts from payees. These receipts would include the usual description of the goods or services purchased, and the date. In addition, the receipt could also include a copy of the note. Under exceptional circumstances, such as an audit, the note would allow the payer, with the cooperation of the bank (and clearing house(s) as described below), to verify which account the note was actually deposited to. 実際に紙幣が預け入れられた口座ではなく、別の口座にその紙幣が預け入れられたということを示している領収書が存在するならば、それは不正行為の証拠であるだろう。不満を持っている闇市場の顧客は、闇市場に供給された紙幣を明らかにすることができ、その結果、その紙幣が最終的に到達した口座までの動きを追跡することができる。盗難に遭ったという報告を受けたもののまだ消去されていない紙幣は、清算機関の一覧に含めることができ、このようにして、消去されることがないようにできる。盗まれた紙幣で既に消去されているものは、その動きを追跡することができる。 A receipt indicating that a note was deposited to an account other than the account actually deposited to would be evidence of fraud. One dissatisfied customer of a black market could reveal a note supplied to the black market, which could then be traced to the account it ultimately ended up in. Uncleared notes reported as stolen could be included on clearing house lists and thus be prevented from being cleared; stolen notes cleared could be traced. 受取人によって支払人に発行された領収書は、全ての流出の管理手段を提供し、したがって、全ての資金の流れの管理手段を提供する。納税者は税務監査のために必要な任意の出費に対する検証可能な領収書を提供することができる。個人は実質的な流入に対する領収書を保持する必要があるかもしれないが、組織が流入に対する領収書を保持するのは望ましくないかもしれない。なぜなら、その組織の顧客を明らかにしてしまう可能性があるからである。 Receipts issued by payee to payer provide control over all outflows, and thus all flows of funds. A taxpayer could provide verifiable receipts for any expenditures needed for tax audit. Individuals could be required to keep receipts for substantial inflows, but inflow receipts maintained by organizations may be undesirable, if they could reveal the organization’s patrons. 精緻化 Elaborations 技術的な機構の効率的な使用、業務の分割および分散化を可能にするために、様々な方法を使って、上記の単純な方式の例を拡張することができる。たとえば、額面金額の異なる複数の紙幣を使用すれば、効率性が明確に向上するだろう。銀行業務および清算機関の業務は分離することができる。複数の銀行が存在する可能性があり、複数の清算機関は異なる銀行あるいは重複する銀行に対して業務を行う可能性がある。紙幣を署名するのに用いられる鍵を定期的に変更すると、安全性および監査可能性が向上し、貨幣供給量に関する不確実性が減少するかもしれない。 The simple system of the above example could be extended in various ways to provide economy of mechanism, disaggregation of services, and decentralization. For example, obvious efficiencies would result from use of multiple denomination notes. The banking and clearing house functions could be separated. There might be multiple banks; multiple clearing houses could serve different or overlapping banks. Periodic changes of the key(s) used to sign notes might increase security, increase auditability, and reduce uncertainty about the size of the money supply. 要約および推測される影響 Summary and implications 新しい種類の暗号学的手法である不視署名を導入した。これによって、現在の方式と比較して、より強力な監査可能性と管理手段を提供し、同時に、より強力な私事権を提供する追跡不能な支払い方式を実現することが可能となる。 A new kind of cryptography, blind signature, has been introduced. It allows realization of untraceable payments systems which offer improved auditability and control compared to current systems, while at the same time offering increased personal privacy.
https://w.atwiki.jp/twwiki/pages/23.html
ベレンガーの秘密 ①プロローグ終盤にケィア・モルヘン内部にいるヴェセミルに話しかける事によって ベレンガーという名のウィッチャーについての話を聞けます ②チャプター1へ続く
https://w.atwiki.jp/terra-tech/pages/140.html
アップデート情報 Steamの公式ニュースを基に記載しています。 最新情報は、以下を参照の事。 https //steamcommunity.com/app/2313330/allnews/ 日本語は意訳であることに注意してください。 2024/03/26 更新 実施されたアップデート クラッシュやフリーズの対応HideUIオプションが有効な場合にインベントリを操作できない問題を修正 弾薬を使用する武器の射撃中に貨物ブロックがテックから撃ち落とされるとクラッシュすることがあった問題を修正 Haloがオフになっているときにキャブ（またはHalo Relocator）がテックから撃ち落とされるとクラッシュすることがあった問題を修正 新規ゲームの起動に失敗し、メインメニューに戻ってしまう問題を修正（ネットワークドライブからゲームを起動している場合）。 分解機Y2がアクティブな状態でセーブをロードするとクラッシュすることがあった問題を修正 認識されている問題 TerraTech Worlds places a greater focus on resource harvesting, handling and processing, ~- TTWは資源の収穫、処理、加工により重点を置いていますが、全体的に遅いバランスが問題になったと認識しています。 資源採集we want to reduce the grind in the early game as we know this has been a big issue for a lot of you.- ゲームの序盤(の資源採集)が多くのプレイヤーにとっての問題であると認識しており、プレイヤーの苦労を減らしたいと考えています。 ~ and included some significant pain points like the small amounts of silicon in boulders.- ～、そして巨岩に含まれるシリコンの量が少量であることも重要な問題であると認識しています。 テックビルドWe also want to allow you to create larger Tech builds, and finally fix the camera height (we’ve definitely heard you on that front)!.- より大きなテックを作成できるようにし、最終的にはカメラの高さを修正したいと考えています（この点について、間違いなく皆さんの意見を聞いていますよ）！ Unfortunately, the first method, Aux Reactors, had to be removed following demo feedback (constant fuel consumption was problematic) and was not able to be reintroduced with a new cost before EA launch (it will occupy a restore instead), they will be back soon.- 残念ながら、最初に考案された補助リアクターはデモ版のフィードバックにより削除され（燃料消費が一定でないことが問題でした）、開発コストが足りずアーリーアクセス前に再導入することができませんでした。すぐに再導入される予定です。 These aren’t the only updates we’re planning, so if your issue isn’t in here, that doesn’t mean we aren’t aware of it. - 私たちが計画しているアップデートはこれだけではありません。もしあなたが問題と思っていることが書かれていなくても、私たちはそれに気づいています。 今後のアップデート予定 資源採集Reduce health for trees, boulders, hematite, cuprite- 木、巨岩、赤鉄鉱、赤銅鉱の耐久値を減らす Remove silicon from boulders and add quartz to the starting area (this will also re-add all resource givers across the planet in ongoing saves, meaning previously harvested resources will be back again)- 巨岩に含まれるシリコンの削除、及びスタート地点へのクォーツの追加→継続的なセーブで惑星全体の資源供給を再追加し、採集された資源が再度採集できるようになります。 Reduce the power consumed by resource lasers to allow players to use lasers for longer and reduce lasers causing overheating- 資源レーザーの消費電力を削減→プレイヤーがより長くレーザーを使用できるようにし、レーザーによるオーバーヒートを低減します。 拠点装置Speed up processing times for the fragmenter- 分解機Y2による資源の処理時間を短縮 Increase the resource yield for the fragmenter- 分解機Y2による資源の収穫量を増加 Allow carbon to burn slower in carbon generators- ACカーボン発電装置のカーボン一つ当たりの発電時間を増加 Increase the default Tech Yard storage and make each expansion larger- TECH YARD、テック置き場ストレージのストレージ容量を増加 クラフトレシピDecrease the ingredient costs of light, heavy and plasma ammo- 軽弾薬、重弾薬、プラズマ弾薬の作成コストを削減 Reduce the crafting time for all ammo types- すべての弾薬のクラフト時間を削減 Decrease the recipe costs for the block fabricator- ブロック合成機の作成コストを削減 Decrease the recipe cost for the Heavy Hauler cab (that required 40 x refined aluminium, when the stack size was 30 making it uncraftable)- 重キャリアーキャブの作成コストを削減→精錬アルミニウムの最大スタックは30でしたが、40個が要求されていたため、クラフトが不可能でした。 戦闘Increase enemy ammo drops- 敵の弾薬ドロップを増加 Increase the block drop rates from enemies (back to demo levels)- 敵からのブロックドロップ率を増加（デモ版時点の確率へ戻す） 大型テックのビルド This is also some feedback we’ve heard pretty unanimously! We want the game to be fun and we want to improve your experience, so here are our plans for this - これらは私たちにほとんど満場一致で寄せられたフィードバックです！私たちはこのゲームを楽しいものにしたいと思っていますし、皆さんのゲーム経験をより良いものにしたいと思っています。 そのために以下のように計画しています。 Increase the combined limit of all cabs (early ones by a bit, late game ones by more)- すべてのキャブの積載上限(※何のの上限かは不明)を増加(序盤のキャブは少し，後半のキャブは大幅に) Increase variance for built-in cab cargo across the cab range- キャブに組み込まれたテック荷台のバリエーションを拡大する 機能Lower the camera focus down by default- デフォルトのカメラのフォーカスを下へ Auto-reduce the height of the camera as it zooms in- ズームイン時にカメラの高さを自動的に下げる機能の追加 Allow players to change the camera focus with a slider- スライダーによるカメラのフォーカス変更機能の追加 コンテンツAdd the block crafter task to the certification (default) objective track (as a duplicate mission to avoid messing with old saves, will automatically complete if you have previously built one)- certification(右上に表示されるミッション)にブロック作成のミッションを追加→既にブロックを作成済みのセーブデータでは，自動的に完了扱いとなります。 Add an objective that asks players to claim a reward to ensure players know how to claim rewards and have claimed the block licence for the Small Cargo (again auto-complete if this has already been done)- プレイヤーがミッション報酬の受け取り方法を知っていて、貨物(小)のブロックライセンスを取得していることを確認するために、プレイヤーに報酬を受け取るよう求めるミッションを追加する。→既に貨物(小)のブロックライセンスを取得済みのセーブデータでは，自動的に完了扱いとなります。 フィードバック先 Finally, we just want to say thank you again for trying out TerraTech Worlds and sticking with us. Early Access is a journey that we’re on together and as mentioned above, your feedback and support is vital during this time. We’re doing everything we can to improve your experience, and please continue to leave your comments and feedback! - 最後に、TerraTech Worldsをプレイし、お付き合いいただいた皆様に改めてお礼を申し上げます。 アーリーアクセスは私たちが共に歩む旅であり、この期間中は皆様からのフィードバックとサポートが不可欠です。 私たちは皆さまの経験を改善するために全力を尽くしていますので、引き続きコメントやフィードバックをお寄せください！ Steamフォーラム 公式X(旧Twitter) 公式Discord コメント欄 + 質問用コメント欄 質問に関するコメントはここにしてください。 名前 コメント + 編集用コメント欄 編集依頼や編集連絡などはここにしてください。 名前 コメント + 雑談用コメント欄 上の2つに当てはまらないコメントはここにしてください。 名前 コメント
https://w.atwiki.jp/mrfrtech/pages/69.html
Market Synopsis Market Research Future (MRFR) conducted study on the Identity as a Service Market Segments 2020 and detailed insights into the effect of COVID pandemic on the market in the report. According to MRFR analysis, the identity as a service (IDaaS) market can rise at 18.4% CAGR across the forecast period. By 2027, the identity as a service (IDaaS) market value can cross USD 10 Bn. The growing deployment of IDaaS on largely accepted cloud platform can boost the expansion of the IDaaS market across the review period. The increase in the adoption of SaaS-based IAM offerings that allow organizations to use single sign-on (SSO) via OpenID Connect (OIDC) or Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) for the authentication and access controls to provide secured access to enterprises' SaaS applications can promote the expansion of the world market of IDaaS. The growing need to curb on-site infrastructure that can support a wide range of integration options can boost the expansion of the IDaaS market. The rise in the level of interconnectivity as IoT and BYOD culture are trending across different verticals can bolster the expansion of the IDaaS market. Rise in IDaaS vendors can also benefit the global market. The high utility of DevSecOps practices for the identification and access management in organizations can fuel the expansion of the market growth. The growing concerns of companies regarding data security limit is pressing the need for IDaaS solutions that can promote the expansion of the global identity as a service (IDaaS) market in the years to come. The rise in preference for on-premise access management systems can pose threat to the IDaaS market. Request a Free Sample @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/7928 Market Segmentation The segments study of the global IDaaS market is based on deployment, service, organization size, and vertical. The service-based, the global IDaaS market segments are access, identity governance administration, and intelligence. The organization size based, the global IDaaS market segments are large enterprise and small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME). The deployment based, the global IDaaS market segments are public cloud, private cloud, and hybrid. The vertical based, the global IDaaS market segments are BFSI, retail and CPG, manufacturing, energy and utilities, transportation, healthcare and life sciences, and government and defense among others. Regional Analysis North America IDaaS market is expected to secure the highest global market size in the forecast period. Led by the US, the market in North America can rise exponentially due to the early adoption of DevSecOps that aids in the identification and allows access to management and strict government directives associated with data protection. The increase in cyber threats and high growing demand for potential and powerful authentication solutions on cloud can drive the IDaaS market in North America. In Asia Pacific, the IDaaS market can expand rapidly in evaluation period. The growing BYOD trend and increase in IoT applications across verticals and increase in the awareness among enterprises regarding security issues can promote the IDaaS market in the Asia Pacific region. APAC is observed to hold high growth prospects, thus the expansion of the IDaaS market in the Asia Pacific region is expected to rise substantially. Key Players MRFR identified some notable players of the global IDaaS market. They are; Okta, Inc. (US), Avatier (US), OneLogin, Inc (US), Fischer Identity (US), Microsoft Corporation, (US), Oracle Corporation (US), Centrify Corporation (US), Ping Identity (US), iWelcome (Netherlands), empowerID (US),VMWare (US), LoginRadius (Canada), IDaptive, LLC. (US), Ubisecure, Inc. (Finland), Sailpoint (US), Optimal IdM(US), Bitium, Inc. (US), and others. These players are recognized by origin, regional presence, recent key innovations, industry expertise, and product diversification. Access Report Details @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/identity-service-market-7928 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Scope of The Report 2.1 Market Definition 2.2 Scope of The Study 2.2.1 Research Objectives 2.2.2 Assumptions Limitations 2.3 Markets Structure 3 Market Research Methodology 3.1 Research Process 3.2 Secondary Research 3.3 Primary Research 3.4 Forecast Model Continued… Similar Report B2B Telecommunication Market Forensic Accounting Market Trending #MRFR Report** https //ictmrfr.blogspot.com/2022/04/geofencing-market-companies-growth-with.html https //blogfreely.net/pranali004/telecom-expense-management-market-size-impressive-cagr-changing-business-scope https //postheaven.net/pranali004/financial-app-industry-impressive-cagr-changing-business-needs-scope-of https //market-research-future.tribe.so/post/openstack-service-market-research-impressive-cagr-changing-scope-of-current--6263de46791566c10c79891e https //www.scutify.com/articles/2022-04-24-infrastructure-as-a-service-industry-cagr-changing-business-scope-of-current-and-future-industry- About Market Research Future At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research Consulting Services. Contact Market Research Future (Part of Wantstats Research and Media Private Limited) 99 Hudson Street, 5Th Floor New York, NY 10013 United States of America 1 628 258 0071 (US) 44 2035 002 764 (UK) Email sales@marketresearchfuture.com Website https //www.marketresearchfuture.com
https://w.atwiki.jp/xboxonescore/pages/754.html
DOOM (1993) 項目数：19 総ポイント：1000 難易度： 対戦・Coop共にローカルのみ。 2時間クリア・Coopナイトメアで全クリアがあるため、XBLA版よりは難しい。 Knee-Deep in the Dead Beat all the levels in "Knee-Deep in the Dead" 75 The Shores of Hell Beat all the levels in "The Shores of Hell" 75 Inferno Beat all the levels in "Inferno" 75 Thy Flesh Consumed Beat all the levels in "Thy Flesh Consumed" 75 I'm the Man! Beat DOOM in under 2 hours 50 Rookie Get 25 kills in deathmatch 20 Showstopper Get 100 kills in deathmatch 50 Not So Bad Beat every level on Nightmare in co-operative mode 75 Guns Are For Wusses Get 25 kills with your fists in a single level 20 Groovy Get 3 multi-kills with the shotgun 20 Shoot It Until It Dies Finish off a Cyberdemon with the pistol 75 Cookin' With Plasma Kill 5 enemies in 5 seconds with the plasma rifle 20 Overkill Kill only a single enemy with a shot from the BFG 20 秘密の実績 Timing Is Everything Kill 2 enemies with a single barrel explosion 50 Doormat Crush a corpse in a door 50 Untouchable Finish a level with 200% armor and 200% health 50 It's a Secret Find a secret level 50 Not a Very Good Secret Find all the secret levels 75 Headhunter Kill one of every enemy 75 + 日本語訳のみ Knee-Deep in the Dead "Knee-Deep in the Dead"のすべてのレベルをクリアする 75 The Shores of Hell "The Shores of Hell"のすべてのレベルをクリア 75 Inferno "Inferno"のすべてのレベルをクリア 75 Thy Flesh Consumed "Thy Flesh Consumed"のすべてのレベルをクリア 75 I'm the Man! 2時間以内にDOOMをクリア 50 Rookie deathmatchで25キル 20 Showstopper deathmatchで100キル 50 Not So Bad co-operative modeでNightmareのすべてのレベルをクリア 75 Guns Are For Wusses single levelで拳で25キル 20 Groovy ショットガンでマルチキルを3つ取得 20 Shoot It Until It Dies ピストルでCyberdemon を倒す 75 Cookin' With Plasma plasma rifleで5秒以内に5人の敵をキル 20 Overkill BFGからのショットで敵を1人だけ倒す 20 秘密の実績 Timing Is Everything １つのバレルの爆発で敵を2人倒す 50 Doormat ドアで死体を粉砕する 50 Untouchable 200%のarmorと200%のhealthでレベルをクリア 50 It's a Secret 秘密レベルを見つける 50 Not a Very Good Secret すべての秘密レベルを見つける 75 Headhunter すべての敵を倒す 75
https://w.atwiki.jp/mrfrtech/pages/78.html
Market Analysis The market for Augmented Analytics (AR) Market Growth is estimated to grow at a significant rate during the forecast period 2020 to 2027. Augmented analytics tools are utilized for analyzing automated data with the support of natural language processing technology and machine learning techniques. It helps in streamlining the process of data modeling and data profiling thus supporting reuse and data governance. The Augmented Analytics (AR) Market Growth is predicted to touch USD 13 billion at a stellar 24% CAGR between 2020- 2027, states the recent Market Research Future (MRFR) analysis. Various factors are fuelling the global augmented analytics market share. As per the recent MRFR market estimates, such factors include the increasing volume of complex data, growing adoption of analytical tools for business intelligence, development of artificial intelligence technology, development in blockchain and modernization of digital technology, increasing need for intelligent business tools in data analysis, growing need for increased productivity of business processes, and increasing implementation of natural language processing tools, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. On the contrary, lack of skilled workforce, high cost of analytical tools, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy, and analyzing the huge generated data by maintaining safety and quality may impede the global augmented analytics market growth over the forecast period. Request a Free Sample @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/7464 Market Segmentation The MRFR report throws light on an inclusive segmental analysis of the global augmented analytics market based on vertical, organization size, deployment mode, and component. By component, the global augmented analytics market is segmented into services and software. The services segment is again bifurcated into managed services and professional services. Of these, the service segment will lead the market over the forecast period. By deployment, the global augmented analytics market is segmented into hybrid, on-cloud, and on-premise. Of these, the on-cloud segment will dominate the market over the forecast period. By organization size, the global augmented analytics market is segmented into large enterprises and SMEs. Of these, the SMEs will spearhead the market over the forecast period. By vertical, the global augmented analytics market is segmented into healthcare, media and entertainment, transportation, energy and utilities, manufacturing, retail, IT and telecommunication, government and defense, BFSI, and others. Of these, BFSI will have the lions share over the forecast period. Regional Analysis By region, the global augmented analytics market covers the recent trends and growth opportunity across North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific (APAC), and Rest of the World (RoW). Of these, North America will rule the market over the forecast period. Presence of key players in the US, technically advanced infrastructure, high technical expertise in technology like machine learning and natural language processing, widespread customer base in various industry verticals, adoption of advanced analytics to improve business operations, rapid adoption of technologies, and focus by companies to improve their data analysis capabilities are adding to the global augmented analytics market growth in the region. In Europe, the global augmented analytics market is predicted to hold the second-largest share over the forecast period. Developing digital technology, increasing need for augmented analytics solutions for business intelligence, and high growth in retail and consumer goods industry are adding to the global augmented analytics market growth in the region. In the APAC region, the global augmented analytics market is predicted to have promising growth over the forecast period. Development in digital technology, increasing expertise in machine learning and natural language processing techniques, development in big data analytics and artificial technology, increasing implementation of data discovery, self-service business intelligence tools, and visualization across business organizations are adding to the global augmented analytics market growth in the region. Japan, China, and India hold the utmost market share. Key Players The leading players profiled in the global augmented analytics market report include Birst, Pyramid Analytics, Logi Analytics, Board International, Yellowfin, Looker, MicroStrategy, Qlik, Sisense, Tibco Software, SAS, Tableau Software, Oracle, Microsoft Corporation, IBM Corporation, SAP SE, and Salesforce. Industry Updates April 2021- Subex has launched hypersense, an end-to-end augmented analytics platform. Browse Complete Report @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/augmented-analytics-market-7464 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Scope of The Report 2.1 Market Definition 2.2 Scope of The Study 2.2.1 Research Objectives 2.2.2 Assumptions Limitations 2.3 Market Structure Continued… Similar Report B2B Telecommunication Market Information by Solution (Unified Communication and Collaboration), Deployment (Fixed, Mobile), Organization Size (Large, Enterprise), Application (Industrial, Commercial) and regions Trending #MRFR Report** https //ictmrfr.blogspot.com/2022/04/geofencing-market-companies-growth-with.html https //blogfreely.net/pranali004/telecom-expense-management-market-size-impressive-cagr-changing-business-scope https //postheaven.net/pranali004/financial-app-industry-impressive-cagr-changing-business-needs-scope-of https //market-research-future.tribe.so/post/openstack-service-market-research-impressive-cagr-changing-scope-of-current--6263de46791566c10c79891e https //www.scutify.com/articles/2022-04-24-infrastructure-as-a-service-industry-cagr-changing-business-scope-of-current-and-future-industry- About Market Research Future At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research Consulting Services. Contact Market Research Future (Part of Wantstats Research and Media Private Limited) 99 Hudson Street, 5Th Floor New York, NY 10013 United States of America 1 628 258 0071 (US) 44 2035 002 764 (UK) Email sales@marketresearchfuture.com Website https //www.marketresearchfuture.com